Metal Casting VS Investment Casting

August 15, 2022

Metal Casting VS Investment Casting

If you are looking for the best casting method for your manufacturing needs, you might come across two methods - Metal Casting and Investment Casting. Both casting methods have their own unique advantages.

Metal Casting

Metal Casting is a traditional casting process that involves pouring liquid metal into a mold. This method has been used for centuries and has been improved with new technologies. It is a versatile process that can be used to produce complex parts with high accuracy levels.

Advantages

  • Relatively low tooling cost
  • High productivity levels
  • Suitable for high volume production

Disadvantages

  • Limited to simple shapes
  • Inconsistent wall thickness
  • Limited to certain types of alloys

Investment Casting

Investment Casting, also known as lost-wax casting, is a precision casting process that involves creating a wax pattern and coating it with a ceramic material. The wax is melted and taken out of the mold, and the resulting cavity is filled with molten metal. This method is used to produce complex parts with intricate details.

Advantages

  • High accuracy levels
  • Suited to produce complex shapes
  • Good surface finish

Disadvantages

  • High tooling cost
  • Lower productivity levels
  • Longer lead times

Comparison

Factor Metal Casting Investment Casting
Tooling Cost Low High
Production Levels High Low
Complexity of Parts Simple Complex
Accuracy Levels Low High
Wall Thickness Inconsistent Consistent
Surface Finish Rough Smooth
Lead Time Short Long

As the comparison table illustrates, the best casting method for your manufacturing needs depends on your priorities. If you need high production levels, Metal Casting is the way to go. However, if you prioritize accuracy levels and surface finish, Investment Casting might be the better option.

In conclusion, both casting methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and it is up to you to choose the one that meets your requirements.

References


© 2023 Flare Compare